Compare
BRS Golf vs GolfTap
BRS Golf is built around connecting clubs to the GolfNow marketplace. This article is for clubs weighing up marketplace distribution against full club operations in a single system, and what that trade-off means in practice.
Quick answer
Choose BRS Golf if: visitor traffic is central to your revenue model and you want GolfNow marketplace exposure to fill unused tee times.
Choose GolfTap if: you want full club operations, tee sheet, memberships, competitions, finance, in one system, and most of your revenue comes from members rather than casual visitors.
About BRS Golf
BRS Golf is a tee time booking platform connected to the GolfNow marketplace. Golfers searching for tee times on GolfNow can find and book directly at clubs that list through BRS, giving those clubs visibility to a large pool of leisure golfers. BRS also provides member management tools and a member app for club communication.
BRS covers tee sheet management, member bookings, and basic back-office functions including membership records. For clubs that need competitions, finance, events, or more comprehensive club operations, additional systems are typically required.
BRS is widely recognised by golfers as a booking platform, which reduces friction for casual visitors already familiar with how GolfNow works.
About GolfTap
GolfTap is a full club management platform: tee sheet, competitions, memberships, events, payments, finance, and member communications in one system. A GolfNow integration is available within GolfTap for clubs that want the option of marketplace distribution alongside full club management, it does not require using BRS as a separate system.
The comparison with BRS is most relevant for clubs that are assessing whether marketplace distribution is worth the trade-offs involved, and for clubs that currently use BRS alongside a separate system for membership and operations and are considering whether consolidating onto one platform would reduce cost and admin work.
How each handles the key areas
Covering the areas where BRS Golf and GolfTap genuinely differ.
Marketplace distribution vs. tee sheet control
BRS Golf connects clubs to GolfNow, one of the largest online tee time marketplaces. This drives real visitor demand: golfers searching for tee times in an area will find the club without the club needing to run its own marketing for visitor slots. Most BRS clubs participate in a barter arrangement, where a portion of tee times are allocated to GolfNow inventory in exchange for marketplace distribution. The club receives a reduced rate for those slots rather than its full green fee.
In GolfTap, the default setup has no barter arrangement. Every tee time slot is controlled by the club. The club sets its own green fee pricing, controls availability, and keeps 100% of the revenue from every booking. For clubs where visitor demand is mainly generated through existing relationships, local marketing, or a strong local reputation, the absence of marketplace distribution may not be a significant gap.
Booking tool vs. full club operations
BRS Golf handles both visitor and member bookings, though it's primarily known for visitor distribution through GolfNow. The platform manages capacity rules, refunds, and availability rules effectively. For clubs that need comprehensive operations beyond booking and member management, competitions, finance, events, or detailed reporting, BRS typically requires additional systems to cover those functions.
In GolfTap, the tee sheet covers both member and visitor bookings. Competitions sit on the same tee sheet. Memberships, renewal reminders, events, payments, and finance are all in the same system. Clubs that currently use BRS alongside one or two other platforms for the rest of their operations will find that managing data across those systems, and the cost of subscribing to multiple tools, adds up.
Tee time availability and peak slot management
BRS Golf clubs participating in barter arrangements typically have some peak weekend slots allocated to GolfNow inventory. This is the mechanism by which the marketplace works, GolfNow needs inventory to sell, and clubs provide it in exchange for distribution. For clubs where weekend morning slots are valuable to members, the degree of control over which slots go to GolfNow inventory is an important negotiation point.
In GolfTap, every slot is controlled by the club's own booking rules. Member-only slots, guest restrictions, advance booking windows, and pricing rules are all set by the club. There is no allocation of slots to an external marketplace. For clubs where member play takes clear priority over visitor revenue, this is a straightforward consideration.
The cost picture
BRS Golf has its own subscription or commission structure. Beyond the direct platform cost, the effective cost of the barter arrangement should also be factored in: the difference between the rate received for barter-allocated tee times and the full green fee represents a real revenue trade. Clubs also typically pay for a separate system to cover competitions, events, and detailed finance reporting, which adds to the total.
In GolfTap, pricing is per-member and covers the full platform. There is also a 1% transaction fee on green fees booked through the platform. There are no additional systems required for memberships, competitions, or finance. For clubs assessing total cost, the comparison should account for BRS plus any other tools currently in use, weighed against GolfTap as a single subscription.
Where each has the edge
Where BRS Golf leads
-
GolfNow marketplace distribution drives real visitor demand, a genuine tool for filling unused tee times that the club would not otherwise sell.
-
Widely recognised by golfers in the UK and Ireland as a booking platform, lower friction for casual visitors already familiar with how to book through it.
-
Purpose-built for the booking flow: refunds, capacity management, and visitor experience are the core focus, not a secondary function.
-
Straightforward setup for clubs focused purely on tee time management without needing broader club management features.
Where GolfTap leads
-
Full club operations in one system: tee sheet, memberships, competitions, events, finance, and communications. No additional systems required.
-
No barter arrangement: the club retains full control over every tee time slot and full revenue from every booking.
-
Every payment, whether from a member or visitor, online or counter card, is recorded in one finance report with no reconciliation across separate systems.
-
Significant cost saving for clubs currently paying for BRS plus a separate membership and finance system alongside it.
Which clubs typically choose each
Clubs that tend to choose BRS Golf
BRS Golf suits clubs with a meaningful proportion of visitor play that want to actively generate tee time demand through the GolfNow marketplace. This includes resort-style courses, courses in tourist areas, and any club where visitor revenue is central to the operation.
Clubs comfortable running memberships, competitions, and finance in a separate system alongside BRS, and where the value of GolfNow distribution outweighs the cost of the barter arrangement, will find BRS a practical fit for the visitor booking function.
Clubs that tend to choose GolfTap
GolfTap fits clubs that want a single system covering everything: tee sheet, memberships, competitions, payments, and finance. It is a common choice for clubs currently running two or more tools alongside each other and wanting to consolidate.
Clubs where most revenue comes from members rather than visitor traffic, and where full control over every tee time slot matters, will find GolfTap the more natural fit.
Still deciding?
If any of these differences are relevant to your club's situation, we're happy to walk through them in a short call. No hard sell. 20 minutes, focused on what your club actually needs.
Also comparing
Last updated April 2026. GolfTap maintains this comparison. We've tried to be accurate about both platforms. If you spot something that needs updating, let us know.
GolfTap features mentioned in this article